Boris Johnson has suffered a fourth defeat in the House of Lords, as peers backed another amendment to the prime minister’s Brexit legislation.

The upper chamber has voted in favour of an amendment to the Withdrawal Agreement Bill known as the Dubs amendment.

A total of 300 peers supported it, with 220 against, a majority of 80.

Lord Dubs speaking at the launch of the Labour Party race and faith manifesto
Lord Dubs fled the Nazis as a child on the Kindertransport

Put forward by Lord Dubs, it calls for the restoration of the right of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with their families in the UK post-Brexit.

The Labour peer fled the Nazis as a child on the Kindertransport.

He has called on the government not to use the small number of children involved as “bargaining chips” in talks with the EU.

Lord Dubs has accused ministers of seeking to remove earlier protections for child refugees in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 – and said it was a matter of humanity to keep them in place.

Calling on Number 10 not to “close the door” on those affected, he said some of the children lived in “shocking conditions” in French camps and were at risk of sexual exploitation.

Lord Dubs told peers that by approving the amendment – and in turn giving the children a safe, legal route to the UK – they would be “thwarting the traffickers” and removing the need for them to seek out more dangerous options to get to their families.

The WAB will go back to the Commons on Wednesday.

Mr Johnson is expected to use his large majority in the lower chamber to overturn the Lords defeats.

The government suffered three reverses in the unelected upper chamber on Monday.

The first was on on the issue of documentation for EU citizens living in Britain, with peers calling for those lawfully residing here to be allowed physical proof of their status.

They then voted in favour of removing ministerial powers over the courts departing from European Court of Justice judgments.

The third defeat saw the Lords back a move to allow cases to be referred to the Supreme Court to decide whether to depart from EU case law.

More follows…

Leave a Reply