Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A questionable ferry contract granted to a firm without any ships as component of no-deal Brexit strategies has actually been scrapped, the federal government has actually claimed.

Ministers had actually run the gauntlet for the ₤138 m manage Seaborne Freight, which the BBC discovered had never ever run a ferry solution.

The Department of Transport claimed it made a decision to axe the bargain after the business’s Irish backer took out.

The federal government claims it remains in “advanced talks” to discover one more ferry company.

Responding to the terminated contract, Labour has actually contacted Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to be or surrender sacked, explaining him as “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph claimed Arklow Shipping, a significant Irish delivery company, withdrew its assistance from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was granted the ₤138 m contract in December to run a freight solution in between Ramsgate and also Ostend, Belgium, on the occasion that Britain leaves the EU without a bargain.

But the federal government faced strong criticism for selecting Seaborne Freight, a firm without any ships or trading background, and also for leaving inadequate time to develop the brand-new ferry solution prior to the Brexit due date of 29 March.

At the moment, the federal government claimed it granted the contract “in the full knowledge” that Seaborne was “a new shipping provider” however claimed the business had actually been”carefully vetted”

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport (DfT) claimed that it had actually come to be clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping revoked the bargain.

A spokesperson claimed: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Thanet District Council – which covers Ramsgate – claimed it was “disappointing” that Arklow Shipping had actually taken out of the bargain. The council claimed it remained in talks with the DfT concerning the port’s duty “in terms of supporting Brexit resilience”.

Andrew Gwynne, the darkness assistant of state for neighborhoods and also city government, informed BBC Radio 4’s Today program: “This is yet once again one more indicator of a federal government that had no prepare for Britain need to we leave the European Union without a bargain.

“It’s one more instance of a significant catastrophe in the hands of Chris Grayling that should be classified as the most awful assistant of state ever before.”

Mick Cash, the basic assistant of the Rail, Maritime and also Transport union – which has actually organized demonstrations asking for the federal government to ensure that the tasks on the brand-new ferry solutions most likely to UK employees – implicated the federal government of “goofing on from situation to situation”.

He claimed: “This federal government ‘wing and also a petition’ method was constantly destined failing and also it’s time for Chris Grayling to quit striking RMT and also begin paying attention to individuals that in fact recognize what they are discussing rather than the chancers offering him a stack of old rope they do not also very own.”

The federal government claimed that no taxpayer cash has actually been moved toSeaborne

It included that its self-confidence in the practicality of the manage Seaborne was based upon Arklow Shipping’s support of the business and also the guarantees it got from them.


What’s the history to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to invest greater than ₤100 m on added ferryboats to reduce “extreme blockage” at Dover, in case of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry firms were granted agreements:

  • ₤466 m to the French business Brittany Ferries
  • ₤425 m to Danish delivery company DFDS
  • ₤138 m to British company Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry solutions in between Ramsgate and alsoOstend Ramsgate has actually not had a normal ferry solution considering that 2013 and also requires to be dug up prior to solutions can begin.

Soon after the agreements were introduced, concerns were raised over exactly how all set the company Seaborne Freight would certainly be.

A BBC examination discovered that Seaborne – which was created in April 2017 – had never ever run a ferry solution. A neighborhood councillor claimed it would certainly be difficult to introduce prior toBrexit

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for added ferry solutions in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and also the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would certainly not await a brand-new ferry line in time.

Last month, Mr Grayling defended the option of Seaborne, and also claimed the federal government had “looked extremely meticulously” at business.

Earlier today, Thanet District Council was considering reducing its investing on the Ramsgate port, which it had actually been pumping cash right into to obtain it all set for ferry procedures.

The council spending plan cuts can have stopped Ramsgate resuming as a ferry port.

The council delayed its decision on the spending plan cuts at the demand of Mr Grayling.


Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A controversial ferry contract awarded to a company with no ships as part of no-deal Brexit plans has been scrapped, the government has said.

Ministers had faced criticism for the £13.8m deal with Seaborne Freight, which the BBC found had never run a ferry service.

The Department of Transport said it decided to axe the deal after the company’s Irish backer pulled out.

The government says it is in “advanced talks” to find another ferry firm.

Responding to the cancelled contract, Labour has called on Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to resign or be sacked, describing him as “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph said Arklow Shipping, a major Irish shipping firm, withdrew its support from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was awarded the £13.8m contract in December to run a freight service between Ramsgate and Ostend, Belgium, in the event that Britain leaves the EU without a deal.

But the government faced strong criticism for choosing Seaborne Freight, a company with no ships or trading history, and for leaving too little time to establish the new ferry service before the Brexit deadline of 29 March.

At the time, the government said it awarded the contract “in the full knowledge” that Seaborne was “a new shipping provider” but said the company had been “carefully vetted”.

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport (DfT) said that it had become clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping backed out of the deal.

A spokesman said: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Thanet District Council – which covers Ramsgate – said it was “disappointing” that Arklow Shipping had pulled out of the deal. The council said it was in talks with the DfT about the port’s role “in terms of supporting Brexit resilience”.

Andrew Gwynne, the shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is yet again another indication of a government that had no plan for Britain should we leave the European Union without a deal.

“It’s another example of a major disaster in the hands of Chris Grayling who must be classed as the worst secretary of state ever.”

Mick Cash, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union – which has staged protests calling for the government to guarantee that the jobs on the new ferry services go to UK workers – accused the government of “blundering on from crisis to crisis”.

He said: “This government ‘wing and a prayer’ approach was always doomed to failure and it’s time for Chris Grayling to stop attacking RMT and start listening to people who actually know what they are talking about instead of the chancers selling him a pile of old rope they don’t even own.”

The government said that no taxpayer money has been transferred to Seaborne.

It added that its confidence in the viability of the deal with Seaborne was based on Arklow Shipping’s backing of the company and the assurances it received from them.


What’s the background to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to spend more than £100m on extra ferries to ease “severe congestion” at Dover, in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry companies were awarded contracts:

  • £46.6m to the French company Brittany Ferries
  • £42.5m to Danish shipping firm DFDS
  • £13.8m to British firm Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry services between Ramsgate and Ostend. Ramsgate has not had a regular ferry service since 2013 and needs to be dredged before services can start.

Soon after the contracts were announced, concerns were raised over how ready the firm Seaborne Freight would be.

A BBC investigation found that Seaborne – which was formed in April 2017 – had never run a ferry service. A local councillor said it would be impossible to launch before Brexit.

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for extra ferry services in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would not be ready for a new ferry line in time.

Last month, Mr Grayling defended the choice of Seaborne, and said the government had “looked very carefully” at the business.

Earlier this week, Thanet District Council was considering cutting its spending on the Ramsgate port, which it had been pumping money into to get it ready for ferry operations.

The council budget cuts could have prevented Ramsgate reopening as a ferry port.

The council delayed its decision on the budget cuts at the request of Mr Grayling.


Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A controversial ferry contract awarded to a company with no ships as part of no-deal Brexit plans has been scrapped, the government has said.

Ministers had faced criticism for the £13.8m deal with Seaborne Freight, which the BBC found had never run a ferry service.

The Department of Transport said it decided to axe the deal after the company’s Irish backer pulled out.

The government says it is in “advanced talks” to find another ferry firm.

Responding to the cancelled contract, Labour has called on Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to resign or be sacked, describing him as “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph said Arklow Shipping, a major Irish shipping firm, withdrew its support from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was awarded the £13.8m contract in December to run a freight service between Ramsgate and Ostend, Belgium, in the event that Britain leaves the EU without a deal.

But the government faced strong criticism for choosing Seaborne Freight, a company with no ships or trading history, and for leaving too little time to establish the new ferry service before the Brexit deadline of 29 March.

At the time, the government said it awarded the contract “in the full knowledge” that Seaborne was “a new shipping provider” but said the company had been “carefully vetted”.

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport (DfT) said that it had become clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping backed out of the deal.

A spokesman said: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Thanet District Council – which covers Ramsgate – said it was “disappointing” that Arklow Shipping had pulled out of the deal. The council said it was in talks with the DfT about the port’s role “in terms of supporting Brexit resilience”.

Andrew Gwynne, the shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is yet again another indication of a government that had no plan for Britain should we leave the European Union without a deal.

“It’s another example of a major disaster in the hands of Chris Grayling who must be classed as the worst secretary of state ever.”

Mick Cash, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union – which has staged protests calling for the government to guarantee that the jobs on the new ferry services go to UK workers – accused the government of “blundering on from crisis to crisis”.

He said: “This government ‘wing and a prayer’ approach was always doomed to failure and it’s time for Chris Grayling to stop attacking RMT and start listening to people who actually know what they are talking about instead of the chancers selling him a pile of old rope they don’t even own.”

The government said that no taxpayer money has been transferred to Seaborne.

It added that its confidence in the viability of the deal with Seaborne was based on Arklow Shipping’s backing of the company and the assurances it received from them.


What’s the background to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to spend more than £100m on extra ferries to ease “severe congestion” at Dover, in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry companies were awarded contracts:

  • £46.6m to the French company Brittany Ferries
  • £42.5m to Danish shipping firm DFDS
  • £13.8m to British firm Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry services between Ramsgate and Ostend. Ramsgate has not had a regular ferry service since 2013 and needs to be dredged before services can start.

Soon after the contracts were announced, concerns were raised over how ready the firm Seaborne Freight would be.

A BBC investigation found that Seaborne – which was formed in April 2017 – had never run a ferry service. A local councillor said it would be impossible to launch before Brexit.

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for extra ferry services in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would not be ready for a new ferry line in time.

Last month, Chris Grayling defended the choice of Seaborne, and said the government had “looked very carefully” at the business.

Earlier this week, Thanet District Council was considering cutting its spending on the Ramsgate port, which it had been pumping money into to get it ready for ferry operations.

The council budget cuts could have prevented Ramsgate reopening as a ferry port.

The council delayed its decision on the budget cuts at the request of Mr Grayling.


Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A controversial ferry contract awarded to a company with no ships as part of no-deal Brexit plans has been scrapped, the government has said.

Ministers had faced criticism for the £13.8m deal with Seaborne Freight, which the BBC found had never run a ferry service.

The Department of Transport said it decided to axe the deal after the company’s Irish backer pulled out.

The government says it is in “advanced talks” to find another ferry firm.

Responding to the cancelled contract, Labour has called on Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to resign or be sacked, describing him as “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph said Arklow Shipping, a major Irish shipping firm, withdrew its support from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was awarded the £13.8m contract in December to run a freight service between Ramsgate and Ostend, Belgium, in the event that Britain leaves the EU without a deal.

But the government faced strong criticism for choosing Seaborne Freight, a company with no ships or trading history, and for leaving too little time to establish the new ferry service before the Brexit deadline of 29 March.

At the time, the government said it awarded the contract “in the full knowledge” that Seaborne was “a new shipping provider” but said the company had been “carefully vetted”.

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport said that it had become clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping backed out of the deal.

A spokesman said: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Andrew Gwynne, the shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is yet again another indication of a government that had no plan for Britain should we leave the European Union without a deal.

“It’s another example of a major disaster in the hands of Chris Grayling who must be classed as the worst secretary of state ever.”

Mick Cash, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union – which has staged protests calling for the government to guarantee that the jobs on the new ferry services go to UK workers – accused the government of “blundering on from crisis to crisis”.

He said: “This government ‘wing and a prayer’ approach was always doomed to failure and it’s time for Chris Grayling to stop attacking RMT and start listening to people who actually know what they are talking about instead of the chancers selling him a pile of old rope they don’t even own.”

The government said that no taxpayer money has been transferred to Seaborne.

It added that its confidence in the viability of the deal with Seaborne was based on Arklow Shipping’s backing of the company and the assurances it received from them.


What’s the background to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to spend more than £100m on extra ferries to ease “severe congestion” at Dover, in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry companies were awarded contracts:

  • £46.6m to the French company Brittany Ferries
  • £42.5m to Danish shipping firm DFDS
  • £13.8m to British firm Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry services between Ramsgate and Ostend. Ramsgate has not had a regular ferry service since 2013 and needs to be dredged before services can start.

Soon after the contracts were announced, concerns were raised over how ready the firm Seaborne Freight would be.

A BBC investigation found that Seaborne – which was formed in April 2017 – had never run a ferry service. A local councillor said it would be impossible to launch before Brexit.

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for extra ferry services in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would not be ready for a new ferry line in time.

Last month, Chris Grayling defended the choice of Seaborne, and said the government had “looked very carefully” at the business.

Earlier this week, Thanet District Council was considering cutting its spending on the Ramsgate port, which it had been pumping money into to get it ready for ferry operations.

The council budget cuts could have prevented Ramsgate reopening as a ferry port.

The council delayed its decision on the budget cuts at the request of Mr Grayling.


Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A controversial ferry contract awarded to a company with no ships as part of no-deal Brexit plans has been scrapped, the government has said.

Ministers had faced criticism for the £13.8m deal with Seaborne Freight, which the BBC found had never run a ferry service.

The Department of Transport said it decided to axe the deal after the company’s Irish backer pulled out.

The government says it is in “advanced talks” to find another ferry firm.

Responding to the cancelled contract, Labour has called on Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to resign or be sacked, describing him as “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph said Arklow Shipping, a major Irish shipping firm, withdrew its support from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was awarded the £13.8m contract in December to run a freight service between Ramsgate and Ostend, Belgium, in the event that Britain leaves the EU without a deal.

But the government faced strong criticism for choosing Seaborne Freight, a company with no ships or trading history, and for leaving too little time to establish the new ferry service before the Brexit deadline of 29 March.

At the time, the government said it awarded the contract “in the full knowledge” that Seaborne was “a new shipping provider” but said the company had been “carefully vetted”.

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport said that it had become clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping backed out of the deal.

A spokesman said: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Andrew Gwynne, the shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is yet again another indication of a government that had no plan for Britain should we leave the European Union without a deal.

“It’s another example of a major disaster in the hands of Chris Grayling who must be classed as the worst secretary of state ever.”

Mick Cash, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union – which has staged protests calling for the government to guarantee that the jobs on the new ferry services go to UK workers – accused the government of “blundering on from crisis to crisis”.

He said: “This government ‘wing and a prayer’ approach was always doomed to failure and it’s time for Chris Grayling to stop attacking RMT and start listening to people who actually know what they are talking about instead of the chancers selling him a pile of old rope they don’t even own.”

The government said that no taxpayer money has been transferred to Seaborne.

It added that its confidence in the viability of the deal with Seaborne was based on Arklow Shipping’s backing of the company and the assurances it received from them.


What’s the background to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to spend more than £100m on extra ferries to ease “severe congestion” at Dover, in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry companies were awarded contracts:

  • £46.6m to the French company Brittany Ferries
  • £42.5m to Danish shipping firm DFDS
  • £13.8m to British firm Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry services between Ramsgate and Ostend. Ramsgate has not had a regular ferry service since 2013 and needs to be dredged before services can start.

Soon after the contracts were announced, concerns were raised over how ready the firm Seaborne Freight would be.

A BBC investigation found that Seaborne – which was formed in April 2017 – had never run a ferry service. A local councillor said it would be impossible to launch before Brexit.

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for extra ferry services in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would not be ready for a new ferry line in time.

Last month, Chris Grayling defended the choice of Seaborne, and said the government had “looked very carefully” at the business.


Ferry services have not operated from Ramsgate since 2013, but Seaborne Freight planned to launch services from there by Brexit day on 29 March

A controversial ferry contract awarded to a company with no ships as part of no-deal Brexit plans has been scrapped, the government has said.

Ministers had faced criticism for the £13.8m deal with Seaborne Freight, which the BBC found had never run a ferry service.

The Department of Transport said it decided to axe the deal after the company’s Irish backer pulled out.

The government says it is in “advanced talks” to find another ferry firm.

Responding to the move, Labour called on Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to resign or be sacked, saying he is “the worst secretary of state ever”.

The Daily Telegraph said Arklow Shipping, a major Irish shipping firm, withdrew its support from Seaborne “without warning”.

Seaborne Freight was awarded the £13.8m contract in December to run a freight service between Ramsgate and Ostend in the event that Britain leaves the EU without a deal on 29 March.

But the government faced strong criticism for choosing Seaborne Freight, company with no ships or trading history, and for leaving too little time to establish the new ferry service before the Brexit deadline of 29 March.

At the time, the government said that it awarded the contract “in the full knowledge that Seaborne is a new shipping provider” and said that the company had been “carefully vetted”.

But on Saturday, the Department of Transport said that it has now become clear that Seaborne “would not reach its contractual requirements”, after Arklow Shipping backed out of the deal.

A spokesman said: “The government is already in advanced talks with a number of companies to secure additional freight capacity – including through the Port of Ramsgate – in the event of a no-deal Brexit.”

Andy McDonald, Labour’s shadow transport secretary, said: “As we predicted, the Seaborne Freight contract has been cancelled. The Chris Grayling catalogue of calamities grows bigger by the day… He has to go.”

And Andrew Gwynne, the shadow shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is yet again another indication of a government that had no plan for Britain should we leave the European Union without a deal.

“It’s another example of a major disaster in the hands of Chris Grayling who must be classed as the worst secretary of state ever.”

The government said that no taxpayer money has been transferred to Seaborne.

It added that its confidence in the viability of the deal with Seaborne was based on Arklow Shipping’s backing of the company and the assurances it received from them.


What’s the background to the Seaborne Freight contract?

In late December 2018, the government confirmed that the UK was to spend more than £100m on extra ferries to ease “severe congestion” at Dover, in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Three ferry companies were awarded contracts:

  • £46.6m to the French company Brittany Ferries
  • £42.5m to Danish shipping firm DFDS
  • £13.8m to British firm Seaborne Freight

Seaborne Freight’s contract was for ferry services between Ramsgate and Ostend. Ramsgate has not had a regular ferry service since 2013 and needs to be dredged before services can start.

Soon after the contracts were announced, concerns were raised over how ready the firm Seaborne Freight would be.

A BBC investigation found that Seaborne – which was formed in April 2017 – had never run a ferry service. A local councillor said it would be impossible to launch before Brexit.

Another councillor said the Port of Ramsgate “cannot be ready” for extra ferry services in time for Brexit day on 29 March, and the mayor of Ostend told the BBC the Belgian port would not be ready for a new ferry line in time.

Last month, Chris Grayling defended the choice of Seaborne, and said the government had “looked very carefully” at the business.